https://www.legacysurvey.org//viewer/?ra=342.3879&dec=3.5486&layer=hsc-dr2&zoom=16
Ultra distant lensing, very interesting colouration. Definitely published and the “arc” looks to be split into two distinct segments
1 Like
was amazed to to find out it was unknown & not in any catalogues ~ even machine-learning A.I, which gets to pour over the data releases before we do managed to miss it
Unfortunately, its in the SSL catalog and will be published later.
1 Like
I was told it wasn’t in any catalogues
Its listed under row 93201 under sorted column 1. At the table under Index of /cfs/cusp/ssl_galaxy_surveys/strong_lens_data, then * linear_predictions_south.tsv, it reads:
The 13 is a typo in the declination, as it is supposed to read “3”. The photometric analysis is (mostly) correct. After a careful inspection, we conclude that this information matches the point source catalogs of Legacy Surveys DR9.
This will be published soon but I don’t know when. The file “linear predictions” stands for predictions containing objects that look like gravitational lensing contains the character “false” which means that the lens is published, or Is too wrong for the gravitational lens. The data is public, but it doesn’t come to reference in astronomy papers, catalogs, and databases (which were or were not publications.
For example: The Siena Galaxy Atlas 2020 took 4 years to be completely published due to the processes it takes for a paper to be published. Publications require good preparation and readiness for them to be in the literature.